![]() |
IAEEL newsletter 3/93
The ABCs of UV Ultraviolet radiation (UV), including that from electric lighting, always has been a concern for art galleries, museums, etc., because of its harmful impact on artifacts. Even though indoor lighting emits much lower levels of UV than normal sunlight does, the strong association found between skin cancer and extensive exposure to sunlight seems to have raised concerns about health effects of UV from electric light sources. To address these concerns, the US-based E Source recently published a report for its members entitled "Ultraviolet Radiation from Electric Lighting". The report concludes that health effects of UV from lighting should continue to be studied, but that normal levels of fluorescent lighting yield so little UV that this is not a valid reason for fearing or avoiding such sources. Where sensitive individuals or artifacts require it, UV filtering is available. Visible light is electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths between 380 and 700 nanometers (nm). The wavelengths of UV range from 100 to 400 nm. Every light source produces some UV, and UV is inherent to the operation of most discharge light sources. UV radiation can be described in two ways:
UV in sunlight can be a thousand-times more intense than typical indoor lighting, but the most dangerous wavelengths (shorter than 290 nm) are screened out by the atmosphere. HEALTH STANDARDS International health standards (IRPA-International Radiations Protection Association) are based on the damage potential of the most potent wavelengths, between 270 and 290 nm. Lamps emit a mix of wavelengths, so to estimate the impact requires that each wavelength's intensity be multiplied by a factor that adjusts for its damage potential. The result is the "effective irradiance" (in W/m^2) of an equivalent amount of UV at 270 nm. Health standards are then typically based on how long (e.g., an eight-hour working day) the skin in sensitive individuals can be exposed to light of a given intensity without harmful effects. LAMPS AND UV(lamps intended to emit UV are not considered here):
MUSEUM CONCERNS Articles circulated among preservationists show that UV levels emitted by compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) are four-times higher than than those of incandescents. However, closer examination has shown that some of these data are erroneous. According to the report, a British UV-meter produced most of the faulty results. The meter "sees" a portion of the visible spectrum as UV, thus skewing its results against any light source rich in violet-blue, such as fluorescent and metal-halide. Moreover, the meter "sees" some of the infrared radiation (i. e. heat) as visible light, favoring the most inefficient incandescents. Better measurements found that UV levels from bare CFLs ranged between 50 and 140 microwatts per lumen (µW/lm) (the US standard, e.g., allows up to 75 µW/lm), while several incandescents exceeded 100 µW/lm. UV levels from CFL fixtures with acrylic lenses were as low as 13 µW/lm, and adding a UV filter cut emissions to less than 2 µW/lm. For comments see letters. Nils Borg Note: Lindsay Audin, author of the E Source report, kindly provided background material for part of this article. |